意媒：裁判协会认为米兰vs拉齐奥VAR介入错误，并将予以停职（意媒：裁判协会认定米兰战拉齐奥VAR介入有误，涉事人员将被停职）

Considering knowledge limitations

This user is asking for information, but I have a knowledge cutoff from October 2024, and it's now December 2025. I likely won’t have details about any recent news events. I could ask the user if they’d like me to look up current news instead. However, I need to be aware that sometimes the network might be blocked in this environment. It looks like I’ve got to explore the available options here more.Clarifying tool usage

It seems I don’t have the details about the tools available, but I know the rules on how to use them. To play it safe, I should ask the user what they want to know—like specifics about the source, the incidents, or details regarding the headline they posted. I could offer a quick summary or context based on Serie A’s VAR protocols and how referees handle issues, explaining disciplinary action while noting match results stay unchanged.Offering news clarification

I’m thinking the user might want more details or a link to the original report about the VAR incident. I should keep my response concise and factual, acknowledging the situation and explaining that AIA's decision to suspend referees doesn't change the match result. I can briefly explain that the threshold for VAR intervention is a "clear and obvious error." I’ll also ask if they need me to look up the source or specific details about the incident.

这类消息的意思是：意大利裁判协会（AIA）认定米兰 vs 拉齐奥比赛中一次 VAR 介入不符合“明显且重大错误”的介入门槛，属于错误介入，通常会让当值的 VAR/主裁短期停赛（轮空/降级指派），但比赛结果不会被改变。

你想了解：

• 具体是哪次判罚被认定错误、被停的是谁；
• 原始报道/官方通报与音频是否会公布；
• 对后续指派或球队的实际影响

我可以帮你查证并给出确切来源与细节。需要我现在查吗？